Top h4831sc load data Secrets
Top h4831sc load data Secrets
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was establishing far more stress and was slower as opposed to previous stuff. I don't bear in mind if I even attempted regular h4831 or not; I am contemplating not.
They have got done identically for me. Like Every person else I rushed to have the newer SC Variation but have now switched back again. Preferably you want about a hundred% loading density. When you've got ample circumstance capacity for your H4831(very long) that you are possibly superior off.
It really is probable that no additional discussion is required, in which circumstance we suggest starting up a different thread. If however you feel your reaction is necessary you are able to even now achieve this.
243, and some of the loads I have started off with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises when the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who understands, I just could possibly discover a use for it after all.
INgunner54 explained: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Found a node and shot some groups.
I know, rough situations. H4831SC will certainly operate, I just did not like the case density when loaded extensive. I do not don't forget powder charge off the best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps and that is the place I typically aim to generally be. As part of your situation employing what you may have (and what I ought to have accomplished) I would begin with the end with the bearing surface area of your bullet appropriate in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you discover a velocity node.
I have utilized h4831 vs h4831sc both of those and utilised the exact same costs and possess not been capable to tell any noticable discrepancies with functionality. the SC Variation meters somewhat smoother is about all. any feedback??
If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you could possibly find a load that works OK While using the 4831. The bullets I tried which were around 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the standard 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most important bullet that would stabilize, but it surely did that beautifully. It's a amusing-seeking bullet that has a rounded nose profile, however it shoots good and kills nicely. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down without delay with rib-cage hits.
With all the shorter Minimize Variation powder arrives nearly the base with the reduce shoulder h4831 vs h4831sc so I however have plenty of place.
Why would I mention this? Precisely what is my level? I'm not sure that there's a actual valid stage apart from precisely what is common with most has not been well-liked with me whatsoever in these circumstances. Do I just Have got a h4831sc load data powder jinx or a little something? Only to teach you how outrageous I actually am, tomorrow I am variety testing a buddies new .
This really is an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an aged thread. Be sure to take into consideration developing a new thread.
Of course, You should utilize precisely the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, nevertheless the SC Variation may possibly permit you to get a tiny bit far more in circumstances in which you are maxing out circumstance volume While using the conventional powder ahead of achieving stress restrictions.
arkansas or ohio i under no circumstances recognized a variation aside from the frequent is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
The truth that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you're viewing increased velocities received with that powder, versus what you've observed Along with the IMR things.